Introduction
Religiosity is a broad and complex concept that can be defined in several ways, and each individual’s perception of it can differ (Chida et al., 2009; Holdcroft, 2006). In recent years, spirituality has been viewed as a medium for finding meaning and harmony in life (Demir, 2018; Roberto et al., 2020). Researchers have taken up a more holistic approach to the study of spirituality, exploring its association to psychological factors (Chida et al., 2009; Roberto et al., 2020).
Many researchers argue that there are positive mental well-being aspects associated with high religiosity (Aten et al., 2019; Nguyen, 2020). This relationship has been the subject of ongoing debates. Even so, certain religions, such as Buddhism, have traditionally viewed them to be interconnected (Mackey, 1998). This interlink could be hinged on how each individual perceives spirituality, societal values, and other external factors (Aten et al., 2019). Additionally, research on the relationship between religion and mental health has significantly increased over the years (Baker et al., 2018; Dein et al., 2020; Garssen et al., 2020; Peres et al., 2017), especially with the Islamic religion (Ghorbani et al., 2019; Koenig & Al Shohaib, 2018; Saleem & Saleem, 2019; Vang et al., 2018). This is particularly relevant to the Maldives, where Islam is the state religion (Wille, 2022). The perception of religion among Maldivian youth has been transforming rapidly over the recent years, and so has the awareness of mental health. Although there is a growing number of young individuals seeking help for their mental well-being (Ibrahim, 2022), there are still individuals who refrain from seeking help concerning their mental health because they are made to believe that going to therapy is a reflection on their weakness in spirituality (Alhomaizi et al., 2018). Some families restrict mental health support for their household members (Radez et al., 2020), which can cause a significant negative impact on the developing brain of the youth, leading to poor quality of life and possibly affecting those around them (Lin & Guo, 2024).
Analyzing the relationship between mental well-being and religiosity among Maldivian youth is an important area of study due to the lack of prior research in the area. Additionally, raising awareness and decreasing the stigma surrounding mental health is essential to encourage more young individuals in the Maldives to seek help and support for their mental health. With mental health awareness rising in the Maldives (Ibrahim, 2022), it seemed the right time to conduct a study to find out the relationship between these two components and the Maldivian youth. This is in order to assess where we are and the knowledge we have about the connection between these two. Hence, the purpose of this study is to examine the association between religiosity and mental well-being among the Maldivian youth population aged 18–24.
Country Context
The Maldives is the smallest country in Asia. It has a long history of Islamic tradition, dating back to the 12th century (Naseem, 2020). The Maldives’ constitution designates Islam as the official religion and its citizens to be Muslims. The Islamic faith plays a major role in the social, cultural, and political context of the Maldives (Fulu & Miedema, 2015; Zahir, 2021). Thus, the law states that both the government and the people must protect religious unity. Correspondingly, Islamic religious practices and beliefs are deeply ingrained in the Maldivian culture. This is often reflected in the day-to-day lives of the Maldivians. For example, the call to prayer, “Azaan,” is heard five times during the day, and Friday prayers are considered to be significantly important (Ahmad, 2001). As an Islamic nation, the people in the Maldives strongly emphasize on the constancy of religious practices and beliefs, such as the use of Islamic faith healing (Ruqya). This can be challenging at times, as individuals experiencing symptoms of mental health conditions, such as schizophrenia, may be told that they are possessed and in need of Ruqya rather than seeking proper medical treatment (Nashaz, 2019).
Literature Review
Over the recent years, multiple studies have explored the relationship between religiosity and mental well-being (see Faturachman et al., 2020; Lalayants et al., 2019; Mahmood et al., 2020). Lalayants et al. (2019) conducted a study involving participants from mixed religious backgrounds, such as Christianity, Islam, and Judaism. They found a strong association between high religiosity and positive mental well-being outcomes. Participants with higher levels of religiosity were reported to have lower psychological distress such as loneliness and social dissatisfaction across all the different religious groups.
Likewise, Malinakova et al. (2020) conducted a study with 1,795 participants and found that individuals with lower levels of religiosity were seen to experience more anxiety compared to those with higher levels of religiosity. The measure that was used to assess religiosity was based on questions of faith education, religious affiliation, non-religious attitudes, and God’s image. Mental well-being was measured by the Experience in Close Relationship-Revised questionnaire and the Brief-Symptom Inventory (BSI-53) (Malinakova et al., 2020).
In contrast, some studies also suggest an association between higher levels of religiosity and negative impacts on the mental well-being of individuals. Hamka et al. (2020) investigated the relationship between religiosity and mental well-being among 209 university students and found that there was a significant negative influence between spiritual well-being (belief and practices) and mental well-being.
In line with this finding, recent meta-analyses have also suggested similar results. Aksoy et al. (2020) conducted a study involving 70,000 participants, revealing that Muslims and individuals from other minority religions had lower mental well-being levels compared to Christians and atheists. Studies also indicate that many individuals use religious practices as a way to cope with day-to-day stress (Nguyen, 2020; Prazeres et al., 2020; Soelton et al., 2020). As mentioned by Ives and Kidwell (2019), religion has the potential to bring individuals and communities together. Sharma and Singh (2018) found that high levels of religiosity were associated with lower levels of distress. A reason for this could be that individuals who regularly attend religious events have the opportunity to meet new people, share their problems, and receive support, which can help them reduce their stress (Pargament & Park, 2019).
While religiosity may have positive impacts on mental well-being, it can also have negative effects, as noted earlier. Some studies suggest that religiosity could lead to excessive guilt and shame (Ames et al., 2018; Marcinechová & Záhorcová, 2020; Minton & Geiger-Oneto, 2020). A few religious figures may even believe they are a better substitute for mental health-related issues compared to mental health professionals. These faith leaders associate mental illness with weakness in faith, which may eventually lead to practices such as exorcism as a “cure” (Prazeres et al., 2020).
Methodology
This study adopted a cross-sectional online survey design. Data was collected from 203 participants. Participants were recruited through a purposive sampling technique through social media platforms such as Facebook and Instagram to target Maldivian youth aged 18–24 years living in the Greater Malé area. Social media recruitment is increasingly recognized as an effective and ethical method to reach specific populations, especially the younger demographics, since it includes broad accessibility and is cost-effective (Gelinas et al., 2017). Prior to conducting the study, ethics clearance was obtained from the Villa College ethics committee and the Maldives National Health Research Council (NHRC). Likewise, key assumptions were also tested prior. Linearity was examined through scatterplots, and no major deviations were observed. Multicollinearity was assessed using Variance Inflation Factor (VIF), with values below 5 indicating no multicollinearity concerns. Normality of residuals was examined using histograms and Q-Q plots, which suggested approximate normal distribution. Homoscedasticity was assessed through residual plots, which indicated no major violations.
Measures
Religious/spiritual level. The Ok-Religious Attitude Scale (ORASI) was used to measure the religious/spiritual level of the participants. The ORASI is a psychological assessment tool developed by Uzeyir Ok, used to measure an individual’s attitudes towards Islamic religious beliefs and practices (Ok, 2016). This instrument was chosen because it was tailored for a Muslim population and it considers both cognitive and behavioral dimensions of Islamic religiosity. The scale was originally developed and validated in Turkey with university students (N = 934 and N = 388) indicating high internal consistency (α ranging from .81 to .91), and a stable four-factor structure shown through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (Ok, 2016). The scale is a self-report questionnaire that consists of a series of statements related to Islam, and individuals were asked to indicate their level of agreement or disagreement with each statement on a five-point Likert-type scale. However, the cultural relevance of the instrument raised questions about the two negatively worded items, especially with regard to the relevant blasphemy laws in the Maldives (End Blasphemy Laws, 2021). Taking this into consideration, the following changes were made. The two following items: “I feel there is no need for religion” and “I feel religion does more harm than good to people,” were removed. Hence, a total of six items were used.
Mental well-being. The Warwick Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS) is a psychological tool used to evaluate an individual’s mental well-being (Tennant et al., 2007). It consists of 14 items that are rated on a five-point Likert-type scale. The WEMWBS can be applied to multiple parts of the world, as it has been used in the UK and several other English and non-English-speaking countries (Stewart-Brown, 2012). In addition, this scale was originally developed and validated with adults (Tennant et al., 2007), making it suitable for this study.
Procedure
The study was completely voluntary, and participants were free to withdraw at any time until the point of submission. Likewise, informed consent was taken from all participants. The privacy and anonymity of participants were strictly maintained throughout the study. The participant consent form ensured the participant’s confirmation of their understanding of the information provided. A pilot test was conducted to assess the effectiveness and feasibility of the research design, procedures, and the instruments (ORASI and WEMWBS). Cronbach’s alpha coefficients indicate that ORASI and WEMWBS demonstrated high levels of reliability. Specifically, the WEMWBS exhibited strong internal consistency (14 items; α = .956). Likewise, the ORASI also showed high levels of reliability (6 items; α = .921). The responses for the online survey were collected over two weeks, and a total of 203 responses were gathered.
The normality test for the data was assessed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk tests. Results of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test indicated that the data from the ORASI deviates significantly from a normal distribution (D (203) = .180, p < .001). Conversely, data from the WEMWBS showed no significant deviation from normality (D (203) = .052, p = .200*). Similarly, the Shapiro-Wilk test confirms that the data for the ORASI is not normally distributed (W (203) = .886, p < .001), and that the data for WEMWBS follows a relatively symmetrical normal distribution (W (203) = .994, p = .649). For the “age,” both the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (D (203) = .142, p < .001) and the Shapiro-Wilk test (W (203) = .914, p < .001) suggest that the data significantly variates from a normal distribution.
After checking the reliability and normality of ORASI and WEMWBS, descriptive statistics were computed for all variables, including demographics. Similarly, mean scores of genders were analyzed for both religiosity and mental well-being. For the ORASI, which measures religiosity, a Mann-Whitney U test was used, and for WEMWBS, which measures mental well-being, an independent sample t-test was used. Furthermore, to measure the correlation between religiosity and mental well-being, the Spearman correlation coefficient was used. Likewise, to determine the relationship between age and religiosity and age and mental well-being, the Spearman’s correlation coefficient was used. Finally, to examine whether age moderates the relationship between both the variables, a regression analysis was used.
Results
Demographic Variables
Age. The respondents had an average age of 21.07 years (N = 203, SD = 2.010 years), with a 95% confidence interval (CI) [20.79, 21.35]. The distribution of respondents within each age category was as follows: 25 (12.3%) respondents were 18 years old, 31 (15.3%) were 19 years old, 33 (16.3%) were 20 years old, 21 (10.3%) were 21 years old, 34 (16.7%) were 22 years old, 26 (12.8%) were 23 years old, and 33 (16.3%) were 24 years old.
Gender. The sample population (N = 203) exhibited variation in terms of gender, revealing that the majority of participants were females, comprising 62.9% (N = 127), whereas the remaining 37.4% (N = 76) were males. The effect size for the difference in mental well-being between males and females was small (Cohen’s d = 0.40).
Educational level. The distribution of educational levels was as follows: 4 respondents (2%) had the highest educational level in trade/technical/vocational training, 43 respondents (21.2%) held an O level/Certificate 3, 58 respondents (28.6%) had an A level/Certificate 4, 62 respondents (30.5%) possessed a diploma. In addition, 25 respondents (12.3%) held a bachelor’s degree, 5 respondents (2.5%) had an associate degree, and 6 respondents (3.0%) had a master’s degree.
Religiosity. Religiosity was assessed using the Ok-Religious Attitude Scale (Islam) (ORASI; Ok, 2016), which originally consists of eight items with a total score range of 0–40. In the present study, two negatively worded items (“I feel there is no need for religion” and “I feel religion does more harm than good”) were removed due to their potential sensitivity within the Maldivian context, where strong religious norms and legal frameworks may influence participants’ willingness to respond openly. Such items may increase the likelihood of socially desirable responding, thereby affecting data validity. As a result, a modified six-item version of the scale was used, with a total score range of 0–30.
Participants rated each item on a five-point Likert scale ranging from “not at all” to “completely.” Given this modification, the psychometric properties reported by Ok (2016) may not be directly applicable to the adapted version. However, the reliability analysis conducted in the present study demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = .921), indicating that the modified scale retained acceptable reliability within this sample.
Descriptive Statistics of Religiosity
The ORASI (N = 203) had a mean score of 21.80 (SD = 6.745), 95% CI [20.87, 22.73], and a range of 24. The skewness value of –0.897 indicates a left-skewed distribution, suggesting the concentration of responses towards higher scores. The kurtosis value of ORASI (–0.304) suggests a comparatively flat distribution compared to a normal distribution.
Mental Well-Being
The WEMWBS (N = 203) has a mean score of 44.68 (SD = 9.794), 95% CI [43.33, 46.03] and a range of 54. The scale exhibited a slightly left-skewed distribution, as indicated by the skewness value of –0.073. This suggests a relatively symmetrical distribution of scores. Similarly, the kurtosis value of –0.105 indicated a relatively flat distribution compared to a normal distribution, suggesting that the distribution of scores on the WEMWBS was less peaked than a perfectly normal distribution.
Comparison of Mean Scores by Gender
For the ORASI, which measures religiosity, a Mann-Whitney U test was used due to the non-normal distribution of the data from the scale. The test results indicated a statistically significant difference in religiosity between males (M = 19.14, SD = 7.633) and females (M = 23.39, SD = 5.608), U = 3395.000, z = –3.541, p < .001. The effect size was small to moderate (r = 0.25). Females exhibited significantly higher levels of religiosity compared to males. Likewise, for the WEMWBS, which assesses mental well-being, an independent sample t-test was used, as the data for the scale exhibited a normal distribution. The results indicated a statistically significant difference in mental well-being between males (M = 47.07, SD = 9.422) and females (M = 43.25, SD = 9.770), t (201) = 2.753, p = .007. Males demonstrated significantly higher levels of mental well-being compared to females (refer to Table 1).
Table 1. Gender Differences in Mean Scores.
| Scale | Male (N = 76) | Female (N = 127) | Test | Test Statistics | P - value | ||
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | ||||
| ORASI | 19.14 | 7.63 | 23.39 | 5.608 | Mann-Whitney U Test | U = 3395.000,z = –3.541 | p = .000 |
| WEMWBS | 47.07 | 9.422 | 43.25 | 9.770 | Independent Samples t-Test | t(201) = 2.753 | p = .007 |
Relationship Between Religiosity and Mental Well-Being
The Spearman correlation coefficient was used to assess the relationship between religiosity and mental well-being. The results of the correlation analysis revealed no significant correlation between religiosity and mental well-being (rs (203) = .044, p = .538), indicating a negligible effect size. Although the correlation did not reach statistical significance, there was a small positive correlation coefficient observed. This indicates that there is a slight tendency for those with higher levels of religiosity to be associated with slightly better mental well-being. However, the findings are not strong enough to be considered statistically significant since they indicate that religiosity was not significantly associated with mental well-being in this sample (refer to Table 2).
Table 2. Correlation Between Religiosity and Mental Well-Being.
| ORASI | WEMWBS | |||
| Spearman’s rho | ORASI | Correlation Coefficient | 1.000 | .044 |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | . | .538 | ||
| N | 203 | 203 | ||
| WEMWBS | Correlation Coefficient | .044 | 1.000 | |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | .538 | . | ||
| N | 203 | 203 | ||
Relationship Between Age and Religiosity
The relationship between age and religiosity was determined using the Spearman’s correlation coefficient. The results suggested that there was no significant difference between age and religiosity (r (203) < .001, p = .998). This indicates that age is not correlated with religiosity among the sample. Moreover, the correlation coefficient being closer to zero further suggests that there is an absence of a significant association (refer to Table 3).
Table 3. Correlation between Age and Religiosity.
| AGE | ORASI | |||
| Spearman’s rho | AGE | Correlation Coefficient | 1.000 | .000 |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | . | .998 | ||
| N | 203 | 203 | ||
| ORASI | Correlation Coefficient | .000 | 1.000 | |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | .998 | . | ||
| N | 203 | 203 | ||
Relationship Between Age and Mental Well-Being
To examine the relationship between age and WEMWBS, the Spearman’s correlation coefficient was used. Results suggest that there is a positive correlation observed among the variables (r (203) = .253, p < .001). This shows a weak but statistically significant positive relationship, indicating that as a participant’s age increases, their well-being scores also slightly increase (refer to Table 4).
Table 4. Correlation between Age and Mental Well-Being.
| AGE | WEMWBS | |||
| Spearman’s rho | AGE | Correlation Coefficient | 1.000 | .253** |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | . | .000 | ||
| N | 203 | 203 | ||
| WEMWBS | Correlation Coefficient | .253** | 1.000 | |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | .000 | . | ||
| N | 203 | 203 | ||
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
Moderating Influence of Age in the Relationship Between Religiosity and Well-Being
To examine whether age moderates the relationship between religiosity and mental well-being, a regression analysis was conducted. This involved religiosity and age as the main predictors of mental well-being, along with an interaction term demonstrating the interaction between age and religiosity. The results suggested that age did not significantly predict mental well-being, B = 1.201, SE = 1.14, β = .08, t = 1.05, p = .294. The overall regression model was not statistically significant, F (2, 200) = 1.32, p = .27, explaining a small proportion of variance (R2 = .013, adjusted R2 = .004). Likewise, the interaction term between age and religiosity was also seen to be non-significant (B = 0.004, p = 0.942), hence indicating that age does not moderate the relationship between religiosity and well-being (refer to Table 5).
Table 5. Moderating influence of Age in the relationship between Religiosity and Well-Being.
| Coefficientsa | ||||||
| Model B | Unstandardized Coefficients | Standardized Coefficients | t | Sig. | ||
| Std. Error | Beta | |||||
| 1 | (Constant) | 21.213 | 24.404 | .869 | .386 | |
| AGE | 1.201 | 1.142 | .246 | 1.052 | .294 | |
| ORASI | –.162 | 1.074 | –.112 | –.151 | .880 | |
| AGE & ORASIINTERACTION | .004 | .050 | .056 | .073 | .942 | |
a. Dependent Variable: Total_WEMWBS.
Discussion
The results of the study indicated that the overall level of religiosity among the Maldivian youth population is high, while the level of mental well-being is moderate. Modest gender differences were observed, with females having slightly higher levels of religiosity compared to males. In contrast, males were observed to have reported slightly higher levels of mental well-being compared to females. These differences are small and should be interpreted cautiously, as they might not generalize beyond the present sample group.
The correlational analysis revealed no significant correlation between religiosity and mental well-being. Although a small positive correlation coefficient was observed, it did not reach statistical significance. These results suggest that religiosity is unlikely to have a major influence on mental well-being among the Maldivian youth.
The findings of the study revealed that high levels of religiosity observed may indicate that religious practices and beliefs are prevalent among Maldivian youth, possibly due to individual conviction or societal expectations (Naseem, 2020; Mohamed et al., 2020). However, the prevalence of religiosity does not seem to translate directly into strengthening mental well-being. This could be because, while religiosity offers moral guidance, a sense of purpose, and belonging (Nguyen, 2020; Prazeres et al., 2020), these aspects may not necessarily alleviate other issues faced by the youth, such as socio-economic hardships, educational pressures, and negative environmental influence (Hostinar & Miller, 2019).
Similarly, the study revealed modest gender differences, with females displaying slightly higher levels of religiosity, and males reporting slightly better mental well-being. These findings are in line with previous studies (Coppola et al., 2021; Etheridge & Spantig, 2022; Villani et al., 2019; Visani et al., 2011). From a traditional perspective, the nurturing and caregiving roles are usually associated with women, which include raising children within their religious beliefs (Coppola et al., 2021). This emphasizes the significance of religion in their life. Moreover, women undergo experiences such as child-rearing, childbirth, and care of the elderly, which is another reason for them to pray and seek spiritual support and guidance through religious practices (Li et al., 2020; Villani et al., 2019). In terms of mental health, multiple studies show that females have a higher prevalence of conditions like depression and eating disorders (Ernst et al., 2021; Etheridge & Spantig, 2022). However, this pattern may be caused due to men’s lower likelihood of seeking help for their mental health concerns (Pattyn et al., 2015).
Considering that the Maldives is a predominantly Muslim country (Naseem, 2020), the higher levels of religiosity observed among the Maldivian youth in the study were expected. However, the lack of significant correlation between religiosity and mental well-being suggests that the relationship between these two variables might differ across several cultures and societies (Aksoy et al., 2020; Bentzen, 2021; Fardin, 2020; Hamka et al., 2020; Mahmood et al., 2020). In a number of Western societies, where previous research has demonstrated a link between religiosity and mental well-being, religious involvement is a personal choice and a source of comfort and community support (Aksoy et al., 2020; Kobayashi et al., 2020; Nguyen, 2020; Malinakova et al., 2020; Prazeres et al., 2020). However, in the Maldives, high religiosity could be more of a result of cultural norms rather than an individual’s personal choice or spiritual fulfillment (Ahmad, 2001; Fulu & Miedema, 2015; Mohamed et al., 2020; Zahir, 2021).
Similarly, the finding that age is not significantly correlated with religiosity aligns with the idea that religiosity in high religious communities may not show significant differences among demographics but is rather influenced by a collective norm (Kobayashi et al., 2020; Prazeres et al., 2020). While the weak positive correlation between age and mental well-being suggests that as individuals age, their well-being slightly increases, this could be due to multiple factors, such as emotional regulation or the increase in life experiences (Aksoy et al. 2020; Nguyen, 2020).
The non-significant interaction conducted between age and religiosity suggested that the effect of religiosity on mental well-being does not differ across ages. This non-significant interaction could be due to the impact of religiosity on mental well-being being more consistent, regardless of age. Some studies suggest that older adults may experience a stronger sense of spiritual contentment (Coppola et al., 2021; Li et al., 2020), while others point out that positive relationships between religiosity and well-being stay consistent across age groups (Nguyen, 2020; Prazeres et al., 2020).
The result of the study highlights the importance of reconsidering mental health strategies focused on the youth population of the Maldives. In many countries, it is common to use religious involvement as a tool to improve mental well-being (Dein et al., 2020; Garssen et al., 2020; Mahamid & Bdier, 2021; Santini et al., 2020). However, this study found no significant correlation between religiosity and mental well-being, or between age and religiosity. There was a slight significant positive relationship between age and mental well-being, which implies that focusing primarily on religious engagement as a way to foster better mental health may not yield the desired outcomes in this particular sample group. Instead, a more effective approach would be to invest in mental health services that directly address the specific needs of the youth. This involves implementing mental health awareness programs in educational institutes, increasing accessibility to counselling services, and launching more public health campaigns focusing on promoting mental well-being (Lindow et al., 2020; McGorry et al., 2022). Mental health professionals should also take note of the gender differences in mental well-being, as indicated by the study. The observation of higher mental distress among female participants in this study emphasizes the need for gender-focused mental health interventions (Comacchio et al., 2022). These interventions should look into specific sociocultural and psychological challenges women face in society, which could possibly contribute to their relatively higher mental distress levels (Chandra et al., 2019; Loewenthal, 2019).
The difference between the findings of this study and those of the previous researches conducted in other cultures (Faturachman et al., 2020; Hamka et al., 2020; Kobayashi et al., 2020; Lalayants et al., 2019; Mahmood et al., 2020; Malinakova et al., 2020) highlights the need for more studies on the relationship between religiosity and mental well-being in the Maldives. As mentioned by Nguyen (2020), a deeper approach of how religion is perceived, practiced, and internalized within the specific culture is important for accurately measuring its potential impact on mental well-being. The high prevalence of religiosity among the Maldivian youth, as found in this study, also holds implications for educators. Religious discussions and understanding play an important role in shaping one’s personal and societal identity (Ives & Kidwell, 2019). As such, educators have the ability to help shape these discussions in a healthier and more constructive manner, creating an environment that promotes critical thinking and personal reflection (Latief et al., 2021; Taufik, 2020).
Given the high level of religiosity, families and communities have an important role in shaping the youth’s understanding and practices of religion (Chelladurai et al., 2022; Eko & Putranto, 2019). According to Chelladurai et al. (2022), engaging young people in open conversations about the influences of religious practices and beliefs on their mental well-being can help to create a more supportive and understanding environment.
Conclusion
The results revealed that even though the overall religiosity levels were high among the sample, their level of mental well-being was only moderate. In terms of the statistical analysis, there was no significant correlation between religiosity and mental well-being. The lack of significant correlation suggests that religiosity is not likely to be a major influencing factor in the mental well-being of Maldivian youth. This study contributes valuable baseline knowledge on the understanding of religiosity and mental well-being among Maldivian youth. The findings emphasize the complex and multifaceted nature of the relationship between both the variables. Hence, mental health professionals, educators, policy makers, and families should consider more holistic approaches to promote the mental well-being of youths, rather than focusing on religiosity alone. Further research can build on this study to deepen the knowledge on the relationship between religiosity and mental well-being.
Directions for Further Research
Despite the insightful findings, the research only focused on participants living in the Greater Malé area, excluding those residing in other islands. The study also only included youths aged 18–24, limiting the variability in age. Further research should include individuals from other islands, as well as broaden the age range to better understand the relationship. Likewise, while this study focused on the relationship between religiosity and mental well-being, other potential influential factors such as socioeconomic status, life stressors, school performance, and history of mental or physical illness were not measured. The absence of these variables could potentially limit the generalizability of these findings. Further studies are needed to study the impact of such various mediating factors on the levels of religiosity and mental well-being. The findings suggest that individuals involved in mental health interventions, educational settings and community organizations should recognize the complex nature of factors contributing to mental well-being beyond religiosity. Thus, it is recommended that a holistic approach is adopted, including aspects such as psychosocial, cultural, and environmental factors to promote optimal mental well-being among individuals. Similarly, even though the ORASI has demonstrated strong psychometric properties in Turkish samples, its cross-cultural validation in other countries is limited. Hence, the interpretation in the Maldivian context should be taken into account carefully.
Conflicts of interest
The authors have no competing interests to declare.
IRB statement
This study received ethical approval from the Villa College Ethics Committee and the National Health Research Council of the Maldives.
References
Ahmad, R. A. (2001). The state and national foundation in the Maldives. Cultural Dynamics, 13(3), 293–315. http://doi.org/10.1177/092137400101300303
Aksoy, O., Bann, D., Fluharty, M. E., & Nandi, A. (2020). Religiosity and mental wellbeing among members of majority and minority religions: Findings from understanding society, the UK household longitudinal study. American Journal of Epidemiology, 191(1), 20–30. http://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwab133
Alhomaizi, D., Alsaidi, S., Moalie, A., Muradwij, N., Borba, C. P., & Lincoln, A. K. (2018). An exploration of the help-seeking behaviors of Arab-Muslims in the US: A socio-ecological approach. Journal of Muslim Mental Health, 12(1). http://doi.org/10.3998/jmmh.10381607.0012.102
Ames, D., Erickson, Z., Youssef, N. A., Arnold, I., Adamson, C. S., Sones, A. C., Yin, J., Haynes, K., Volk, F., Teng, E. J., Oliver, J. P., & Koenig, H. G. (2018). Moral injury, religiosity, and suicide risk in U.S. veterans and active duty military with PTSD symptoms. Military Medicine, 184(3–4), 271–278. http://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usy148
Aten, J. D., Smith, W. R., Davis, E. B., Van Tongeren, D. R., Hook, J. N., Davis, D. E., Shannonhouse, L., DeBlaere, C., Ranter, J., O’Grady, K., & Hill, P. C. (2019). The psychological study of religion and spirituality in a disaster context: A systematic review. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 11(6), 597–613. http://doi.org/10.1037/tra0000431
Baker, J. O., Stroope, S., & Walker, M. H. (2018). Secularity, religiosity, and health: Physical and mental health differences between atheists, agnostics, and nonaffiliated theists compared to religiously affiliated individuals. Social Science Research, 75, 44–57. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2018.07.003
Bentzen, J. S. (2021). In crisis, we pray: Religiosity and the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 192, 541–583. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2021.10.014
Chandra, P. S., Saraf, G., Bajaj, A., & Satyanarayana, V. A. (2019). The current status of gender-sensitive mental health services for women—findings from a global survey of experts. Archives of Women’s Mental Health, 22(6), 759–770. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-019-01001-2
Chelladurai, J. M., Kelley, H. H., Marks, L. D., & Dollahite, D. C. (2022). Humility in family relationships: Exploring how humility influences relationships in religious families. Journal of Family Psychology, 36(2), 201–211. http://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000860
Chida, Y., Steptoe, A., & Powell, L. H. (2009). Religiosity/spirituality and mortality. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 78(2), 81–90. http://doi.org/10.1159/000190791
Comacchio, C., Antolini, G., Ruggeri, M., & Colizzi, M. (2022). Gender-oriented mental health prevention: A reappraisal. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(3), 1493. http://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031493
Coppola, I., Rania, N., Parisi, R., & Lagomarsino, F. (2021). Spiritual well-being and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.626944
Dein, S., Loewenthal, K., Lewis, C. A., & Pargament, K. I. (2020). COVID-19, mental health and religion: An agenda for future research. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 23(1), 1–9. http://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2020.1768725
Demir, E. (2018). The evolution of spirituality, religion and health publications: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. Journal of Religion and Health, 58(1), 1–13. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-018-00739-w
Eko, B. S., & Putranto, H. (2019). The role of intercultural competence and local wisdom in building intercultural and inter-religious tolerance. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 48(4), 341–369. http://doi.org/10.1080/17475759.2019.1639535
End Blasphemy Laws. (2021). Maldives. Retrieved May 29, 2023. https://end-blasphemy-laws.org/countries/asia-central-southern-and-south-eastern/maldives/
Ernst, M., Werner, A. M., Tibubos, A. N., Beutel, M. E., De Zwaan, M., & Brähler, E. (2021). Gender-dependent associations of anxiety and depression symptoms with eating disorder psychopathology in a representative population sample. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.645654
Etheridge, B., & Spantig, L. (2022). The gender gap in mental well-being at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from the UK. European Economic Review, 145, 104–114. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2022.104114
Fardin, M. A. (2020). COVID-19 epidemic and spirituality: A review of the benefits of religion in times of crisis. Jundishapur Journal of Chronic Disease Care, 9(2). http://doi.org/10.5812/jjcdc.104260
Faturachman, F., Latifa, R., Al Bastari, H. F., Ratnasari, R. D., Firmansyah, R., Octavia, A., GF, P., Addha, A., & Rustiana, H. (2020). Religious resilient school: A mental health school study. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Religion and Mental Health, ICRMH 2019, 18–19 September 2019, Jakarta, Indonesia. http://doi.org/10.4108/eai.18-9-2019.2293417
Fulu, E., & Miedema, S. (2015). Globaliation and changing family relations: Family violence and women’s resistance in Asian Muslim societies. Sex Roles, 74(11–12), 480–494. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0540-7
Garssen, B., Visser, A., & Pool, G. (2020). Does spirituality or religion positively affect mental health? Meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 31(1), 4–20. http://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2020.1729570
Gelinas, L., Pierce, R., Winkler, S., Cohen, I. G., Lynch, H. F., & Bierer, B. E. (2017). Using social media as a research recruitment tool: Ethical issues and recommendations. The American Journal of Bioethics, 17(3), 3–14. http://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2016.1276644
Ghorbani, N., Chen, Z. J., Rabiee, F., & Watson, P. (2019). Religious fundamentalism in Iran: Religious and psychological adjustment within a Muslim cultural context. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 41(2), 73–88. http://doi.org/10.1177/0084672419878832
Hamka, Ni’matuzahroh, & Mein-Woei, S. (2020). Spiritual well-being and mental health of students in Indonesia. Proceedings of the 5th ASEAN Conference on Psychology, Counselling, and Humanities (ACPCH 2019). http://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200120.032
Holdcroft, B. B. (2006). What is religiosity. Journal of Catholic Education, 10(1). http://doi.org/10.15365/joce.1001082013
Hostinar, C. E., & Miller, G. E. (2019). Protective factors for youth confronting economic hardship: Current challenges and future avenues in resilience research. American Psychologist, 74(6), 641–652. http://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000520
Ibrahim, N. (2022, June 8). Statistics paint a dire picture of mental health in Maldives. SunOnline International. Retrieved December 7, 2022. https://en.sun.mv/75315
Ives, C. D., & Kidwell, J. (2019). Religion and social values for sustainability. Sustainability Science, 14(5), 1355–1362. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00657-0
Kobayashi, D., First, M. B., Shimbo, T., & Hirano, Y. (2020). Association of self-reported religiosity with the development of major depression in Multireligious country Japan. SSRN Electronic Journal. http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3520081
Koenig, H. G., & Al Shohaib, S. S. (2018). Religiosity and mental health in Islam. In H. Moffic, J. Peteet, A. Hankir, & R. Awaad (Eds.), Islamophobia and Psychiatry (pp. 55–65). http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00512-2_5
Lalayants, M., Oyo, A., & Prince, J. D. (2019). Religiosity and outcomes among child welfare-involved youth. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 37(3), 251–261. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-019-00645-4
Latief, S., Sari, Y. A., Yusuf, M., Armila, A., & Hidayat, R. E. (2021). The development of Islamic education and strengthening of national education system of Indonesia. International Journal on Advanced Science, Education, and Religion, 4(2), 86–99. http://doi.org/10.33648/ijoaser.v4i2.105
Li, Y., Woodberry, R., Liu, H., & Guo, G. (2020). Why are women more religious than men? Do risk preferences and genetic risk predispositions explain the gender gap? Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 59(2), 289–310. http://doi.org/10.1111/jssr.12657
Lin, J., & Guo, W. (2024). The research on risk factors for adolescents’ mental health. Behavioral Sciences, 14(4), 263. http://doi.org/10.3390/bs14040263
Lindow, J. C., Hughes, J. L., South, C., Minhajuddin, A., Gutierrez, L., Bannister, E., Trivedi, M. H., & Byerly, M. J. (2020). The youth aware of mental health intervention: Impact on help seeking, mental health knowledge, and stigma in U.S. adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 67(1), 101–107. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.01.006
Loewenthal, K. M. (2019). Intersections among religion, culture, gender, and mental health. In J. A. Mena & K. Quina (Eds.), Integrating Multiculturalism and Intersectionality into the Psychology Curriculum: Strategies for Instructors (pp. 143–156). American Psychological Association. http://doi.org/10.1037/0000137-012
Mackey, J. P. (1998). Hinnels, John R. (ed.). 1997. A new handbook of living religions. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 902. Studies in World Christianity, 4(2), 276–277. http://doi.org/10.3366/swc.1998.4.2.276
Mahamid, F. A., & Bdier, D. (2021). The association between positive religious coping, perceived stress, and depressive symptoms during the spread of coronavirus (COVID-19) among a sample of adults in Palestine: Across sectional study. Journal of Religion and Health, 60(1), 34–49. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-020-01121-5
Mahmood, Q. K., Sohail, M. M., & Akram, M. B. (2020). Cross sectional survey of Pakistani Muslims coping health anxiety through religiosity during COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Religion and Health, 60, 1462–1474. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-021-01218-5
Malinakova, K., Tavel, P., Meier, Z., Van Dijk, J. P., & Reijneveld, S. A. (2020). Religiosity and mental health: A contribution to understanding the heterogeneity of research findings. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(2), 494. http://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17020494
Marcinechová, D., & Záhorcová, L. (2020). Sexual satisfaction, sexual attitudes, and shame in relation to religiosity. Sexuality & Culture, 24(6), 1913–1928. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-020-09727-3
McGorry, P. D., Mei, C., Chanen, A., Hodges, C., Alvarez-Jimenez, M., & Killackey, E. (2022). Designing and scaling up integrated youth mental health care. World Psychiatry, 21(1), 61–76. http://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20938
Minton, E. A., & Geiger-Oneto, S. (2020). Making one’s religious self feel better about luxury use: The role of religiosity in choice of disposal option for luxury goods. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 19(6), 581–593. http://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1825
Mohamed, N., Taheri, B., Farmaki, A., Olya, H., & Gannon, M. J. (2020). Stimulating satisfaction and loyalty: Transformative behaviour and Muslim consumers. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 32(9), 2903–2923. http://doi.org/10.1108/ijchm-04-2020-0330
Naseem, A. (2020). Regressing for progress. In K. A. Jacobsen (Ed.), Routledge handbook of South Asian religions. Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780429054853-26/regressing-progress-azra-naseem
Nashaz, M. (2019, October 3). Why does a mental health stigma exist in the Maldives? Doctor Maldives (Doctor.mv). Retrieved January 28, 2023. https://www.doctor.mv/category/6-health-wellness/article/181-why-does-a-mental-health-stigma-exist-in-the-maldives
Nguyen, A. W. (2020). Religion and mental health in racial and ethnic minority populations: A review of the literature. Innovation in Aging, 4(5). http://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa035
Ok, Ü. (2016). The Ok-Religious Attitude Scale (Islam): Introducing an instrument originated in Turkish for international use. Journal of Beliefs & Values, 37(1), 55–67. http://doi.org/10.1080/13617672.2016.1141529
Pargament, K. I., & Park, C. L. (2019). In times of stress: The religion-coping connection. In B. Spilka & D. N. McIntosh (Eds.), The Psychology of Religion (pp. 44–53). Routledge. http://doi.org/10.4324/9780429495915-4
Pattyn, E., Verhaeghe, M., & Bracke, P. (2015). The gender gap in mental health service use. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 50(7), 1089–1095. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-015-1038-x
Peres, M. F., Kamei, H. H., Tobo, P. R., & Lucchetti, G. (2017). Mechanisms behind religiosity and spirituality’s effect on mental health, quality of life and well-being. Journal of Religion and Health, 57(5), 1842–1855. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-017-0400-6
Prazeres, F., Passos, L., Simões, J. A., Simões, P., Martins, C., & Teixeira, A. (2020). COVID-19-related fear and anxiety: Spiritual-religious coping in healthcare workers in Portugal. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(1), 220. http://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18010220
Radez, J., Reardon, T., Creswell, C., Lawrence, P. J., Evdoka-Burton, G., & Waite, P. (2020). Why do children and adolescents (not) seek and access professional help for their mental health problems? A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 30(2), 183–211. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-019-01469-4
Roberto, A., Sellon, A., Cherry, S. T., Hunter-Jones, J., & Winslow, H. (2020). Impact of spirituality on resilience and coping during the COVID-19 crisis: A mixed-method approach investigating the impact on women. Health Care for Women International, 41(11–12), 1313–1334. http://doi.org/10.1080/07399332.2020.1832097
Saleem, T., & Saleem, S. (2019). Religiosity and death anxiety: A study of Muslim dars attendees. Journal of Religion and Health, 59(1), 309–317. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-019-00783-0
Santini, Z. I., Jose, P. E., Koyanagi, A., Meilstrup, C., Nielsen, L., Madsen, K. R., & Koushede, V. (2020). Formal social participation protects physical health through enhanced mental health: A longitudinal mediation analysis using three consecutive waves of the survey of health, ageing and retirement in Europe (SHARE). Social Science & Medicine, 251, 112906. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112906
Sharma, S., & Singh, K. (2018). Religion and well-being: The mediating role of positive virtues. Journal of Religion and Health, 58(1), 119–131. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-018-0559-5
Soelton, M., Amalia, D., Noermijati, N., & Wahyudiono, B. (2020). Self-esteem: The levels of religiosity in job insecurity and stress in government company. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Management, Economics and Business (ICMEB 2019). http://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200205.052
Stewart-Brown, S. (2012). The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS): Performance in different cultural and geographical groups. In C. Keyes (Ed.), Mental Well-Being (pp. 133–150). Springer. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5195-8_7
Taufik, M. (2020). Strategic role of Islamic religious education in strengthening character education in the era of Industrial Revolution 4.0. Jurnal Ilmiah Islam Futura, 20(1), 86. http://doi.org/10.22373/jiif.v20i1.5797
Tennant, R., Hiller, L., Fishwick, R., Platt, S., Joseph, S., Weich, S., Parkinson, J., Secker, J., & Stewart-Brown, S. (2007). The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS): Development and UK validation. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 5(1). http://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-5-63
Vang, Z. M., Hou, F., & Elder, K. (2018). Perceived religious discrimination, religiosity, and life satisfaction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 20(6), 1913–1932. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-018-0032-x
Villani, D., Sorgente, A., Iannello, P., & Antonietti, A. (2019). The role of spirituality and religiosity in subjective well-being of individuals with different religious status. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01525
Visani, D., Albieri, E., Offidani, E., Ottolini, F., Tomba, E., & Ruini, C. (2011). Gender differences in psychological well-being and distress during adolescence. In I. Brdar (Ed.), The Human Pursuit of Well-Being (pp. 65–70). Springer. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1375-8_6
Wille, B. (2022). The appropriation of Islam in the Maldives. In D. Ludden (Ed.), Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Asian History. http://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190277727.013.680
Zahir, A. (2021). Islam and democracy in the Maldives: Interrogating reformist Islam’s role in politics (1st ed.). Routledge. 224. http://doi.org/10.4324/9781003181453
