Skip to main content
Abstract Articles

Neochordal Replacement vs Leaflet Resection for Surgical Mitral Valve Repair

Authors: Thomas Basala ( University of Michigan Medical School; Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation) , Sara Olson ( Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation) , Christian Schmidt ( Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation) , Robert Steffen ( Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation)

  • Neochordal Replacement vs Leaflet Resection for Surgical Mitral Valve Repair

    Abstract Articles

    Neochordal Replacement vs Leaflet Resection for Surgical Mitral Valve Repair

    Authors: , , ,

Keywords: mitral valve , valvular heart disease , cardiac surgery

Download

Downloads:
Download HTML

Introduction

Mitral regurgitation (MR) can cause severe heart failure and left ventricular dysfunction if left untreated. The Society for Thoracic Surgeons database reported that over 20,000 patients underwent mitral valve (MV) surgery from 2014-2016, with over half receiving a repair. Mitral valve repair (MVr) for degenerative valve disease has been proven to improve survival in patients undergoing MV surgery. Traditionally, repair was done by resecting diseased segments of the MV leaflets. Recently, there has been interest in repairing valves using artificial neochords. There is a clinical equipoise between neochordal repair and leaflet resection for MVr and thus, the choice of repair is based on surgeon preference.

This study aims to evaluate if the use of artificial neochords for MVr can lead to better long-term outcomes than resection of the mitral valve leaflet.

Methods

This study is a retrospective chart review of all patients (n=401) who underwent MVr surgery at Abbott Northwestern Hospital between January 2011 and December 2019. Patients were stratified by method of MVr: Resection+Annuloplasty Ring, Neochord+Annuloplasty Ring, or Annuloplasty Ring. Primary end-points include freedom from mitral re-intervention surgery over time, changes in postoperative MV gradient, and freedom from postoperative severe MR.

Results

There were no clinically significant differences in preoperative comorbidities and risk-factors between groups. One-year post-operation, patients who underwent neochordal repair of the MV had a greater rate of MV re-intervention surgeries compared to all groups (Figure 1, p<0.001). There were no differences in postoperative recurrence of severe MR between the neochord and leaflet resection groups (2% incidence for both) and no differences in post-operative MV mean gradient (3.0 mmHg for both). However, there was a larger MV area observed among patients who underwent neochordal repair compared to leaflet resection (3.8 cm2 vs 2.4 cm2; p < 0.05), suggesting that native MV leaflet tissue is better preserved in neochordal repair.

Conclusions

At our center, neochordal repair of the MV had an increased rate of mitral re-intervention, but better preserved native MV leaflet area. Clinically meaningful outcomes of neochordal repair vs leaflet resection remain unclear given our study's limitations.

A screen shot of a graph Description automatically generated

12 Views

0 Downloads

Published on
13 Dec 2025
Peer Reviewed

Publication details

  • Article Number: 42

Jump to

File Checksums (MD5)

  • HTML: 3fda3c668ee012efb1d47b5c94f1defa